growth: be in property plant related to range of service expected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents transformation
Weight: 0.64
, indicator
Weight: 0.63
, change
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.59
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.36
, recovery
Weight: 0.33
, stabilization
Weight: 0.33
, evolution
Weight: 0.33
, consumption
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in property plant related to range of service expected 1.00
be in property plant related to range expected 0.98
be in property plant related to range of service 0.97
be in property plant related to range 0.95
be in plants 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(growth, be in property plant related to range of service expected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(growth, be in property plant related to range of service expected)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(growth, be in property plant related to range of service expected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(growth, be in plants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(growth, be in property plant related to range of service expected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(growth, be in plants)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(growth, be in property plant related to range of service expected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(growth, be in plants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(growth, be in property plant related to range of service expected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(growth, be in plants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(growth, be in property plant related to range of service expected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(growth, be in property plant related to range of service expected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(growth, be in property plant related to range of service expected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(growth, be in property plant related to range of service expected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(growth, be in property plant related to range of service expected)