guacamole: be bad for dogs

Related concepts

Parents	dish Weight: 0.70 , sauce Weight: 0.65 , snack Weight: 0.64 , food Weight: 0.63 , recipe Weight: 0.60
Siblings	potato salad Weight: 0.38 , spaghetti sauce Weight: 0.38 , fruit salad Weight: 0.37 , apple sauce Weight: 0.37 , cheesecake Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be bad for dogs	1.00
go bad	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(food, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(guacamole, be bad for dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(guacamole, be bad for dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(food, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(guacamole, be bad for dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(food, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(guacamole, be bad for dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(potato salad, go bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(food, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(guacamole, be bad for dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(guacamole, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(guacamole, be bad for dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(potato salad, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(potato salad, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(guacamole, be bad for dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Salient(guacamole, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(guacamole, be bad for dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(guacamole, go bad)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(guacamole, be bad for dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(guacamole, go bad)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.19

Salient(guacamole, be bad for dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(guacamole, go bad)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(guacamole, be bad for dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(guacamole, go bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Salient(guacamole, be bad for dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(guacamole, be bad for dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(guacamole, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(guacamole, be bad for dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(guacamole, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(guacamole, be bad for dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(food, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(guacamole, be bad for dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(potato salad, go bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(guacamole, be bad for dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(food, go bad)