guard: be in england

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security guard
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.61
, position
Weight: 0.61
, servant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings rip
Weight: 0.51
, across
Weight: 0.42
, west berlin
Weight: 0.36
, cornerback
Weight: 0.33
, linebacker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in england 1.00
be in america 0.82
make america great 0.78
have british american accent 0.76
be important in texas holdem 0.76
make america great again 0.76
be different in florida 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(position, be important in texas holdem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(guard, be in england)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(position, be different in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(guard, be in england)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(guard, be in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(position, be different in florida)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(guard, be in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(position, be important in texas holdem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(guard, be in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(position, be different in florida)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(guard, be in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(position, be important in texas holdem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(position, be important in texas holdem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(guard, be in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(guard, be in england)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(position, be different in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(guard, be in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(guard, be in england)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(guard, be in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(guard, be in england)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(guard, be in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(guard, be in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(guard, be in england)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(guard, be in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(guard, be in england)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(guard, be in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(position, be different in florida)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(guard, be in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(position, be important in texas holdem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(guard, be in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(position, be different in florida)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(guard, be in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(position, be important in texas holdem)