guard: block big men

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security guard
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.61
, position
Weight: 0.61
, servant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings rip
Weight: 0.51
, across
Weight: 0.42
, west berlin
Weight: 0.36
, cornerback
Weight: 0.33
, linebacker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
block big men 1.00
block men 0.95
be allowed block 0.83
is big 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(guard, block big men)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(cornerback, be allowed block)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(guard, block big men)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(linebacker, is big)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(guard, block big men)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(cornerback, be allowed block)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(cornerback, be allowed block)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(guard, block big men)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(linebacker, is big)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(linebacker, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(guard, block big men)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(guard, block big men)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(guard, block big men)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(guard, block men)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(guard, block big men)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(guard, block men)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(guard, block big men)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(guard, block men)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(guard, block big men)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(guard, block men)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(guard, block big men)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guard, block big men)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(guard, block big men)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(guard, block big men)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guard, block big men)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(guard, block big men)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cornerback, be allowed block)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(guard, block big men)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(linebacker, is big)