guest: select hotel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.63
, duty
Weight: 0.59
, third party
Weight: 0.58
, ceremony
Weight: 0.58
Siblings host
Weight: 0.65
, magician
Weight: 0.61
, bill gates
Weight: 0.61
, groucho marx
Weight: 0.61
, david
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
select hotel 1.00
return to hotel 0.84
stay at ice hotel 0.80
identify other guests 0.76
identify guests 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(guest, select hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(guest, select hotel)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(guest, select hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(guest, return to hotel)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(guest, select hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(guest, return to hotel)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(guest, select hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(guest, return to hotel)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(guest, select hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(guest, return to hotel)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(guest, select hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(guest, stay at ice hotel)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(guest, select hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(guest, stay at ice hotel)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(guest, select hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(guest, stay at ice hotel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(guest, select hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(guest, stay at ice hotel)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(guest, select hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(guest, identify other guests)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(guest, select hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(guest, identify other guests)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(guest, select hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(guest, identify other guests)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(guest, select hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(guest, identify other guests)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(guest, select hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(guest, select hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(guest, select hotel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(guest, select hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(guest, select hotel)