gum: be at store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents candy
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings shellac
Weight: 0.44
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35
, lollipop
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate
Weight: 0.34
, candy cane
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at store 1.00
be buy at store 0.91
be buy in store 0.90
be at shop 0.85
be at mall 0.83
be at supermarket 0.83
be buy in shop 0.82
be store in cupboard 0.82
be at candy store 0.81
be display on store shelf 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(gum, be at store)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(gum, be at store)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(candy, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(gum, be at store)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(gum, be at store)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(candy, be at shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(gum, be at store)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(thing, be buy at store)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(candy, be at mall)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(candy, be at supermarket)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(thing, be store in cupboard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(product, be display on store shelf)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(thing, be store in cupboard)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(thing, be buy at store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(product, be at shop)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(product, be at shop)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(item, be at store)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be at candy store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(gum, be at store)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(gum, be at store)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(candy, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(gum, be at store)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(gum, be at store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(thing, be buy at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(gum, be at store)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chocolate, be at candy store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be at candy store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(gum, be at store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(gum, be at store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(candy, be at store)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(candy, be at shop)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(chocolate, be at candy store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(candy, be at store)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(gum, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(candy, be at shop)
...