gum: be banned in schools

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents candy
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, chewing gum
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
Siblings acacia
Weight: 0.65
, milk chocolate
Weight: 0.35
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35
, rock candy
Weight: 0.35
, lollipop
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in schools 1.00
be banned from schools 0.99
be banned in school 0.96
be banned from school 0.95
be in school prohibited 0.88
be allowed in school 0.81
be in school 0.80
be baned from school 0.79
affect school campuses 0.79
be good in school 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chewing gum, be baned from school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gum, be banned in schools)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chewing gum, be good in school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gum, be banned in schools)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chewing gum, be in school prohibited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gum, be banned in schools)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chewing gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gum, be banned in schools)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be banned in schools)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be in school prohibited)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be good in school)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be baned from school)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be banned in schools)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be in school prohibited)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be baned from school)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be good in school)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chewing gum, be baned from school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(gum, be banned in schools)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chewing gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(gum, be banned in schools)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chewing gum, be in school prohibited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(gum, be banned in schools)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chewing gum, be good in school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(gum, be banned in schools)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(gum, be banned in schools)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gum, be banned from schools)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gum, be banned from school)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gum, be banned from schools)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gum, be banned from school)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(gum, be banned from schools)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(gum, be banned from schools)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(gum, be banned from school)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(gum, be banned from school)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gum, be banned in schools)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be banned in schools)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be in school prohibited)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be baned from school)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be good in school)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be banned in schools)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be in school prohibited)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be baned from school)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(gum, be banned in schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be good in school)