gum: be in food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents candy
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, chewing gum
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
Siblings acacia
Weight: 0.65
, milk chocolate
Weight: 0.35
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35
, rock candy
Weight: 0.35
, lollipop
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in food 1.00
is food 0.98
be used in food 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chewing gum, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(gum, be in food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(candy, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(gum, be in food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(candy, is food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, is food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(candy, is food)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, is food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chewing gum, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(gum, be in food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(candy, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(gum, be in food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(gum, be in food)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(gum, is food)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(gum, is food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(gum, be used in food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(gum, is food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(gum, is food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(gum, be used in food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(gum, be used in food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(gum, be used in food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(gum, be in food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(gum, be in food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(chewing gum, is food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(candy, is food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(chewing gum, is food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(gum, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(candy, is food)