gum: be included in military field rations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents candy
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, chewing gum
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
Siblings acacia
Weight: 0.65
, milk chocolate
Weight: 0.35
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35
, rock candy
Weight: 0.35
, lollipop
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be included in military field rations 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chewing gum, be included in military field rations)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(gum, be included in military field rations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(gum, be included in military field rations)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be included in military field rations)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(gum, be included in military field rations)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be included in military field rations)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chewing gum, be included in military field rations)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(gum, be included in military field rations)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(gum, be included in military field rations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(gum, be included in military field rations)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(gum, be included in military field rations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(gum, be included in military field rations)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(gum, be included in military field rations)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(gum, be included in military field rations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(gum, be included in military field rations)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(gum, be included in military field rations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(gum, be included in military field rations)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be included in military field rations)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(gum, be included in military field rations)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be included in military field rations)