gum: taste

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents candy
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, chewing gum
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
Siblings acacia
Weight: 0.65
, milk chocolate
Weight: 0.35
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35
, rock candy
Weight: 0.35
, lollipop
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste 1.00
have flavor 0.83
have long flavor 0.81
keep flavor 0.81
run out of flavor 0.80
lose flavor 0.79
have flavor named 0.79
lose quickly flavor 0.77
have different flavors of minty ness 0.77
have flavors of minty ness 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chewing gum, lose flavor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gum, taste)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(candy, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gum, taste)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(candy, taste)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, lose flavor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, lose flavor)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(candy, taste)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(candy, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(gum, taste)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chewing gum, lose flavor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(gum, taste)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(gum, taste)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(gum, run out of flavor)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(gum, keep flavor)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(gum, lose flavor)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(gum, run out of flavor)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(gum, lose flavor)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(gum, keep flavor)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(gum, run out of flavor)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(gum, lose flavor)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(gum, keep flavor)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(gum, run out of flavor)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(gum, lose flavor)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(gum, keep flavor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gum, taste)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gum, taste)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(candy, taste)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(chewing gum, lose flavor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(candy, taste)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(gum, taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(chewing gum, lose flavor)