gum: was created

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents candy
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, chewing gum
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
Siblings acacia
Weight: 0.65
, milk chocolate
Weight: 0.35
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35
, rock candy
Weight: 0.35
, lollipop
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was created 1.00
was invented 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(chewing gum, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gum, was created)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(candy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gum, was created)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(candy, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gum, was created)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(candy, was created)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(candy, was invented)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, was invented)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(candy, was invented)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(candy, was created)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rock candy, was invented)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cotton candy, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(candy, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(gum, was created)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(chewing gum, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(gum, was created)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(candy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(gum, was created)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cotton candy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cotton candy, was invented)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rock candy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(rock candy, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(gum, was created)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(gum, was invented)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gum, was invented)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(gum, was invented)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(gum, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gum, was created)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gum, was created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(candy, was created)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(candy, was invented)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chewing gum, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cotton candy, was invented)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(rock candy, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(candy, was created)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(candy, was invented)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(gum, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chewing gum, was invented)