guru: was important to sikhs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.55
, artist
Weight: 0.53
, term
Weight: 0.53
, film
Weight: 0.50
, word
Weight: 0.49
Siblings entrepreneur
Weight: 0.33
, wise man
Weight: 0.32
, legend
Weight: 0.32
, writer
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to sikhs 1.00
is nanak important to sikhs 0.99
be important to sikhs 0.99
is bahadur important to sikhs 0.97
is tegh bahadur important to sikhs 0.97
is nanak sacred for tibetan buddhist 0.76
was sahib important 0.75
was granth sahib important 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(guru, was important to sikhs)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(guru, is tegh bahadur important to sikhs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(guru, is nanak important to sikhs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(guru, be important to sikhs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(guru, is bahadur important to sikhs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(guru, be important to sikhs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(guru, is nanak important to sikhs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(guru, is bahadur important to sikhs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(guru, is tegh bahadur important to sikhs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guru, is nanak sacred for tibetan buddhist)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(guru, be important to sikhs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(guru, was granth sahib important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(guru, was sahib important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(guru, is nanak important to sikhs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(guru, be important to sikhs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(guru, is bahadur important to sikhs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(guru, is nanak important to sikhs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(guru, was sahib important)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(guru, was granth sahib important)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(guru, is nanak sacred for tibetan buddhist)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(guru, is bahadur important to sikhs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(guru, is tegh bahadur important to sikhs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(guru, was sahib important)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(guru, was granth sahib important)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(guru, is nanak sacred for tibetan buddhist)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(guru, was sahib important)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(guru, is tegh bahadur important to sikhs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(guru, was granth sahib important)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(guru, is nanak sacred for tibetan buddhist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(guru, was important to sikhs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(guru, was important to sikhs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(guru, was important to sikhs)