gym: have dress codes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, club
Weight: 0.58
, room
Weight: 0.57
Siblings laundry room
Weight: 0.35
, dining room
Weight: 0.34
, hotel room
Weight: 0.34
, golf club
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have dress codes 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(club, have dress codes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(gym, have dress codes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(gym, have dress codes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(club, have dress codes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(gym, have dress codes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(club, have dress codes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(gym, have dress codes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(golf club, have dress codes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(club, have dress codes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(gym, have dress codes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(gym, have dress codes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(gym, have dress codes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(golf club, have dress codes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(golf club, have dress codes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(gym, have dress codes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(gym, have dress codes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(gym, have dress codes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(gym, have dress codes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(gym, have dress codes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(gym, have dress codes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(gym, have dress codes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(gym, have dress codes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(club, have dress codes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(gym, have dress codes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(golf club, have dress codes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(gym, have dress codes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(club, have dress codes)