gymnastics: were uneven bars invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
Siblings trampoline
Weight: 0.59
, rowing
Weight: 0.35
, badminton
Weight: 0.35
, professional wrestling
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
were uneven bars invented 1.00
were uneven bars 0.94
were bars invented 0.90
were bars 0.82
was invented 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(badminton, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(badminton, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(gymnastics, were uneven bars)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(gymnastics, were uneven bars)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(gymnastics, were uneven bars)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(gymnastics, were uneven bars)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(gymnastics, were bars)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(gymnastics, were bars)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(gymnastics, were bars)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(gymnastics, were bars)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(gymnastics, was invented)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(gymnastics, was invented)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(gymnastics, was invented)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(gymnastics, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(gymnastics, were uneven bars invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(badminton, was invented)