h: be called king of kings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, element
Weight: 0.55
, standard
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.53
Siblings jesse james
Weight: 0.33
, santa fe
Weight: 0.32
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.32
, stockholm
Weight: 0.32
, adam smith
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called king of kings 1.00
king of kings 0.99
be called king 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(h, be called king of kings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, be called king)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(h, be called king of kings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(michael jackson, be called king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(michael jackson, be called king)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(h, be called king of kings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(h, be called king of kings)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(h, be called king of kings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(h, be called king)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(h, be called king of kings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(h, king of kings)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(h, be called king of kings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(h, be called king)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(h, be called king of kings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(h, be called king)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(h, be called king of kings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(h, be called king)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(h, be called king of kings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(h, king of kings)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(h, be called king of kings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(h, king of kings)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(h, be called king of kings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(h, king of kings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(h, be called king of kings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(h, be called king of kings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(h, be called king of kings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(h, be called king of kings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(h, be called king of kings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(h, be called king of kings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(michael jackson, be called king)