h: be in thyme

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, element
Weight: 0.55
, standard
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.53
Siblings jesse james
Weight: 0.33
, santa fe
Weight: 0.32
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.32
, stockholm
Weight: 0.32
, adam smith
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in thyme 1.00
be in herb 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(h, be in thyme) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(h, be in thyme)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(h, be in thyme) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(h, be in herb)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(h, be in thyme) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(h, be in herb)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(h, be in thyme) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(h, be in herb)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(h, be in thyme) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(h, be in herb)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(h, be in thyme) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(h, be in thyme) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(h, be in thyme)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(h, be in thyme) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(h, be in thyme)