h: become stable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, element
Weight: 0.55
, standard
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.53
Siblings jesse james
Weight: 0.33
, santa fe
Weight: 0.32
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.32
, stockholm
Weight: 0.32
, adam smith
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
become stable 1.00
become form 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(element, become stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(h, become stable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(h, become stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(element, become stable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(h, become stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(element, become stable)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(element, become stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(h, become stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(h, become stable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(h, become stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(h, become stable)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(h, become stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(h, become form)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(h, become stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(h, become form)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(h, become stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(h, become form)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(h, become stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(h, become form)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(h, become stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(h, become stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(h, become stable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(h, become stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(h, become stable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(h, become stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(element, become stable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(h, become stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(element, become stable)