habitat: be connceted

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.55
, charity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.73
, wetland
Weight: 0.71
, pond
Weight: 0.65
, freshwater
Weight: 0.65
, marsh
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be connceted 1.00
have npp 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be connceted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(marsh, have npp)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(habitat, be connceted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(marsh, have npp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(marsh, have npp)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(habitat, be connceted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(habitat, be connceted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(habitat, be connceted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(habitat, be connceted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be connceted)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(habitat, be connceted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(habitat, be connceted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be connceted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(marsh, have npp)