habitat: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.55
, charity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.73
, wetland
Weight: 0.71
, pond
Weight: 0.65
, freshwater
Weight: 0.65
, marsh
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
put person at risk for health problems 0.77
has state dislike 0.76
put someone at risk of health problems 0.76
has state complex 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(activity, put person at risk for health problems)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(habitat, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(activity, put someone at risk of health problems)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(habitat, has state problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(factor, has state dislike)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(habitat, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(factor, has state dislike)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(activity, put someone at risk of health problems)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(activity, put person at risk for health problems)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(factor, has state dislike)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(activity, put person at risk for health problems)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(activity, put someone at risk of health problems)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(activity, put person at risk for health problems)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(habitat, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(activity, put someone at risk of health problems)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(habitat, has state problem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(factor, has state dislike)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(habitat, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(habitat, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(habitat, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(activity, put someone at risk of health problems)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(activity, put person at risk for health problems)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(factor, has state dislike)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(activity, put someone at risk of health problems)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(factor, has state dislike)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(habitat, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(activity, put person at risk for health problems)