hacking: have damn obvious

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.63
, computer network
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, breach
Weight: 0.53
Siblings computer virus
Weight: 0.35
, hack
Weight: 0.33
, stealing
Weight: 0.32
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.32
, piracy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have damn obvious 1.00
have obvious 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(hacking, have damn obvious)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hacking, have damn obvious)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(hacking, have damn obvious)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hacking, have obvious)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hacking, have damn obvious)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(hacking, have obvious)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(hacking, have damn obvious)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(hacking, have obvious)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hacking, have damn obvious)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(hacking, have obvious)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hacking, have damn obvious)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hacking, have damn obvious)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hacking, have damn obvious)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(hacking, have damn obvious)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hacking, have damn obvious)