hail: consist of layers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents storm
Weight: 0.55
, event
Weight: 0.52
, element
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, weather
Weight: 0.49
Siblings tornado
Weight: 0.32
, thunderstorm
Weight: 0.32
, rain
Weight: 0.31
, dust storm
Weight: 0.31
, bad weather
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
consist of layers 1.00
consist of multiple layers 0.97
consist of layers of ice 0.96
consist of multiple layers of ice 0.94
has physical part layers 0.80
have visible layers 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(hail, consist of layers)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(hail, consist of layers of ice)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hail, consist of multiple layers of ice)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(hail, consist of multiple layers)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(hail, consist of layers of ice)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hail, consist of multiple layers of ice)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hail, consist of layers of ice)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hail, consist of layers of ice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hail, consist of multiple layers of ice)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(hail, consist of multiple layers of ice)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(hail, has physical part layers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hail, have visible layers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hail, consist of multiple layers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(hail, consist of multiple layers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hail, consist of multiple layers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(hail, has physical part layers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hail, has physical part layers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hail, have visible layers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(hail, have visible layers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hail, have visible layers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hail, has physical part layers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(hail, consist of layers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(hail, consist of layers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(hail, consist of layers)