:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hair, be burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(skin, burn)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hair, be burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(skin, be burn)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(hair, be burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(skin, be burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(skin, be burn)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(hair, be burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(skin, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(skin, burn)
Salient implies Plausible
0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(hair, be burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(hair, be burn)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(hair, be burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(hair, be burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hair, be burn)
Typical implies Plausible
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(hair, be burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(hair, be burn)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hair, be burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(skin, be burn)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hair, be burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(skin, burn)