hairdresser: use toner after highlights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.61
, woman
Weight: 0.59
, job
Weight: 0.58
, business
Weight: 0.53
Siblings barber
Weight: 0.35
, old woman
Weight: 0.35
, salon
Weight: 0.35
, barber shop
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
use toner after highlights 1.00
use toner 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, use toner after highlights)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(salon, use toner)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hairdresser, use toner after highlights)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(salon, use toner)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(salon, use toner)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hairdresser, use toner after highlights)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(hairdresser, use toner after highlights)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hairdresser, use toner after highlights)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, use toner)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(hairdresser, use toner after highlights)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hairdresser, use toner)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(hairdresser, use toner after highlights)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(hairdresser, use toner)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(hairdresser, use toner after highlights)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, use toner)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(hairdresser, use toner after highlights)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hairdresser, use toner after highlights)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, use toner after highlights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hairdresser, use toner after highlights)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hairdresser, use toner after highlights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, use toner after highlights)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(salon, use toner)