halo: is top good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents franchise
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, shooter
Weight: 0.56
, title
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings nipple
Weight: 0.32
, aura
Weight: 0.32
, blob
Weight: 0.32
, hair color
Weight: 0.32
, freckle
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is top good 1.00
is top bad 0.96
is top neverfull 0.94
be top keto 0.81
is top ice cream healthy 0.79
has quality good 0.79
is great 0.79
is top ice cream 0.76
is big 0.76
is good game 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(franchise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(halo, is top good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(franchise, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(franchise, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(freckle, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(nipple, is big)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(blob, is big)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(franchise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(halo, is top good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(freckle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(freckle, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(blob, is big)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(blob, is big)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(nipple, is big)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(nipple, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(halo, is top good)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(halo, is top bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(halo, is top bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(halo, is top bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(halo, is top bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(halo, be top keto)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(halo, is top ice cream healthy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(halo, be top keto)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(halo, be top keto)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(halo, is top ice cream healthy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(halo, is top ice cream healthy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(halo, is top ice cream healthy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(halo, be top keto)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(halo, is good game)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(halo, is top ice cream)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(halo, is top ice cream)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(halo, is top ice cream)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(halo, is good game)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(halo, is top ice cream)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(halo, is good game)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(halo, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(halo, is good game)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(halo, is big)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(halo, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(halo, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(halo, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(halo, is big)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(halo, is big)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(halo, is big)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(halo, is top good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(halo, is top good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(franchise, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(freckle, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(blob, is big)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(nipple, is big)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(halo, is top good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(franchise, has quality good)