ham: be toxic to dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lunch meat
Weight: 0.69
, cheese
Weight: 0.59
, recipe
Weight: 0.58
, staple
Weight: 0.58
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.35
, cream cheese
Weight: 0.34
, salami
Weight: 0.34
, cheddar
Weight: 0.34
, sausage
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be toxic to dogs 1.00
be bad for dogs 0.84
be bad for cats 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ham, be toxic to dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sausage, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ham, be toxic to dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sausage, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(sausage, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(ham, be toxic to dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ham, be bad for cats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(ham, be bad for cats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ham, be bad for cats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(ham, be bad for dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(ham, be bad for dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ham, be bad for dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ham, be bad for cats)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ham, be bad for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(ham, be toxic to dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ham, be toxic to dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sausage, be bad for dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ham, be toxic to dogs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)