ham: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lunch meat
Weight: 0.69
, cheese
Weight: 0.59
, recipe
Weight: 0.58
, staple
Weight: 0.58
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.35
, cream cheese
Weight: 0.34
, salami
Weight: 0.34
, cheddar
Weight: 0.34
, sausage
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is great 0.81
be good for us 0.80
has shape solid 0.79
has quality advantage 0.77
is best 0.76
is good together 0.76
is damn good 0.76
be of of best things 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cheese, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ham, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lunch meat, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ham, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(staple, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ham, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lunch meat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ham, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cheese, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(staple, has quality advantage)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cheese, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(staple, has quality advantage)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(cream cheese, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cheddar, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sausage, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(salami, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cream cheese, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sausage, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cheese, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(ham, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lunch meat, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(ham, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lunch meat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(ham, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(staple, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(ham, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sausage, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(sausage, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cream cheese, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cream cheese, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(salami, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(salami, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cheddar, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cheddar, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sausage, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sausage, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(cream cheese, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cream cheese, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ham, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ham, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ham, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(ham, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ham, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(staple, has quality advantage)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lunch meat, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cheese, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cream cheese, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sausage, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sausage, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(salami, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cream cheese, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cheddar, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lunch meat, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cheese, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ham, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(staple, has quality advantage)