hamburger: is junk food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.72
, meal
Weight: 0.71
, food
Weight: 0.67
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.66
, sausage
Weight: 0.65
Siblings cheeseburger
Weight: 0.38
, sandwich
Weight: 0.37
, pizza
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is junk food 1.00
be considered junk food 0.98
be stigmatized as junk food 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is junk food)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be considered junk food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pizza, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pizza, is junk food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pizza, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(pizza, be considered junk food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(hamburger, is junk food)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be stigmatized as junk food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be stigmatized as junk food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(hamburger, be stigmatized as junk food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hamburger, be stigmatized as junk food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hamburger, be considered junk food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be considered junk food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be considered junk food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(hamburger, be considered junk food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is junk food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hamburger, is junk food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pizza, is junk food)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(pizza, be considered junk food)