hand sanitizer: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.64
, product
Weight: 0.63
, gel
Weight: 0.61
, soap
Weight: 0.60
Siblings disinfectant
Weight: 0.35
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.35
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.35
, wash cloth
Weight: 0.34
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
go bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wash cloth, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wash cloth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(wash cloth, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(hand sanitizer, go bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hand sanitizer, go bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(hand sanitizer, go bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hand sanitizer, go bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wash cloth, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mouthwash, has quality bad)