handbag: be at woman hand

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.66
, accessory
Weight: 0.62
, bag
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wallet
Weight: 0.58
, shoulder bag
Weight: 0.57
, satchel
Weight: 0.50
, necklace
Weight: 0.36
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at woman hand 1.00
be used to woman 0.91
be at person hand 0.89
be at woman department 0.83
be at woman clothe store 0.81
be at woman closet 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(shoulder bag, be at woman closet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(shoulder bag, be at woman clothe store)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(satchel, be at person hand)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(satchel, be at person hand)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(satchel, be at person hand)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(shoulder bag, be at woman clothe store)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shoulder bag, be at woman clothe store)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(shoulder bag, be at woman closet)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(shoulder bag, be at woman closet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(handbag, be at woman hand)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(handbag, be at woman closet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(handbag, be at woman closet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(handbag, be used to woman)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(handbag, be at woman department)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(handbag, be used to woman)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(handbag, be at woman department)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(handbag, be at woman closet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(handbag, be at woman department)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(handbag, be used to woman)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(handbag, be used to woman)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(handbag, be at woman department)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(handbag, be at woman closet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(handbag, be at woman hand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(handbag, be at woman hand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(satchel, be at person hand)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(shoulder bag, be at woman clothe store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(handbag, be at woman hand)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(shoulder bag, be at woman closet)