handle proposal: requires judgement

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires judgement 1.00
requires good judgement 0.83
requires knowledge 0.75
requires skill 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(handle proposal, requires judgement)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(handle proposal, requires judgement)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(handle proposal, requires judgement)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(handle proposal, requires good judgement)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(handle proposal, requires judgement)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(handle proposal, requires good judgement)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(handle proposal, requires judgement)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(handle proposal, requires skill)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(handle proposal, requires judgement)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(handle proposal, requires knowledge)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(handle proposal, requires judgement)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(handle proposal, requires skill)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(handle proposal, requires judgement)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(handle proposal, requires knowledge)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(handle proposal, requires judgement)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(handle proposal, requires knowledge)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(handle proposal, requires judgement)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(handle proposal, requires good judgement)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(handle proposal, requires judgement)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(handle proposal, requires good judgement)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(handle proposal, requires judgement)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(handle proposal, requires skill)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(handle proposal, requires judgement)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(handle proposal, requires skill)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(handle proposal, requires judgement)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(handle proposal, requires knowledge)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(handle proposal, requires judgement)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(handle proposal, requires judgement)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(handle proposal, requires judgement)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(handle proposal, requires judgement)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(handle proposal, requires judgement)