hanging: is down bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.59
, punishment
Weight: 0.58
, decoration
Weight: 0.50
, question
Weight: 0.47
Siblings firing squad
Weight: 0.45
, living thing
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.33
, laughing
Weight: 0.32
, whipping
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is down bad 1.00
is down bad luck 0.89
is upside down bad luck 0.86
is down luck 0.83
is upside down luck 0.80
is upside bad luck 0.78
has quality bad 0.77
is bad luck 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(punishment, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hanging, is down bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hanging, is down bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(punishment, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(punishment, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(punishment, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(hanging, is down bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(hanging, is down bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(laughing, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hanging, is down bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hanging, is down bad luck)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hanging, is down luck)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hanging, is upside down bad luck)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(hanging, is down bad luck)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hanging, is down bad luck)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hanging, is down bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hanging, is down bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(laughing, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(hanging, is down bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)