hard drive: work on physical level

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disk drive
Weight: 0.79
, drive
Weight: 0.78
, computer disk
Weight: 0.68
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.67
Siblings floppy disk
Weight: 0.66
, save
Weight: 0.52
, flash memory
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, personal computer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
work on physical level 1.00
work on level 0.95
has physical part face 0.79
is work 0.77
work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hard drive, work on physical level)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(drive, work on physical level)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(drive, work on physical level)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(floppy disk, is work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(save, work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(save, has physical part face)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(hard drive, work on physical level)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(save, has physical part face)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(save, has physical part face)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(save, work)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(save, work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(floppy disk, is work)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(floppy disk, is work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(hard drive, work on physical level)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, work on level)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hard drive, work on level)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hard drive, work on level)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(hard drive, work on level)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, work on physical level)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hard drive, work on physical level)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(drive, work on physical level)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(save, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(save, has physical part face)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(floppy disk, is work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(hard drive, work on physical level)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(drive, work on physical level)