hardware: have work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents merchandise
Weight: 0.64
, operating system
Weight: 0.64
, engineering
Weight: 0.61
, module
Weight: 0.59
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
Siblings software
Weight: 0.35
, electronics
Weight: 0.34
, unix
Weight: 0.33
, solaris
Weight: 0.33
, macintosh
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have work 1.00
work 0.95
have work together 0.87
working over time 0.81
stop working 0.78
actually make hardware work 0.77
work better cold 0.77
has state job 0.76
work cold 0.76
has state works 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(module, work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(hardware, have work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(strategy, work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(hardware, have work)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(merchandise, has state job)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(hardware, have work)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(engineering, has state works)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(hardware, have work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(strategy, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(module, work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(engineering, has state works)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(merchandise, has state job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(merchandise, has state job)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(module, work)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(engineering, has state works)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(electronics, stop working)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(software, actually make hardware work)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(electronics, work)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(software, work)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(software, have work)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(software, have work together)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(module, work)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(hardware, have work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(strategy, work)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(hardware, have work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(merchandise, has state job)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(hardware, have work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(engineering, has state works)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(hardware, have work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(software, have work)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(software, have work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(software, work)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(software, work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(electronics, work)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(electronics, work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(software, have work together)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(software, have work together)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(electronics, stop working)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(electronics, stop working)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(software, actually make hardware work)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(software, actually make hardware work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(hardware, have work)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(hardware, have work together)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work together)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hardware, have work together)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(hardware, have work together)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(hardware, have work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(strategy, work)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(module, work)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(engineering, has state works)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(merchandise, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(software, have work)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(software, work)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(software, have work together)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(electronics, work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(electronics, stop working)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(software, actually make hardware work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(strategy, work)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(module, work)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(engineering, has state works)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(hardware, have work)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(merchandise, has state job)