harrods: is successful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents store
Weight: 0.55
, department store
Weight: 0.49
, name
Weight: 0.45
, shop
Weight: 0.42
, place
Weight: 0.38
Siblings convenience store
Weight: 0.28
, grocery store
Weight: 0.28
, clothing store
Weight: 0.28
, hardware store
Weight: 0.28
, home depot
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
is successful 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(harrods, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(home depot, is successful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(harrods, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, is successful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(harrods, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(convenience store, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(convenience store, is successful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(harrods, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(home depot, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(home depot, is successful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(harrods, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(harrods, is successful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(harrods, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(harrods, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(harrods, is successful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(harrods, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(harrods, is successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(harrods, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(home depot, is successful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(harrods, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(convenience store, is successful)