hash table: use numbers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents table
Weight: 0.59
, structure
Weight: 0.56
, application
Weight: 0.55
, algorithm
Weight: 0.54
Siblings picnic table
Weight: 0.39
, coffee table
Weight: 0.39
, dining table
Weight: 0.39
, table saw
Weight: 0.37
, sofa
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use numbers 1.00
use prime numbers 0.86
have used in restaurant numbers 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(table, have used in restaurant numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hash table, use numbers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hash table, use numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(table, have used in restaurant numbers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(hash table, use numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(table, have used in restaurant numbers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(table, have used in restaurant numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(hash table, use numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hash table, use numbers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hash table, use numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(hash table, use numbers)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hash table, use numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hash table, use prime numbers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(hash table, use numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hash table, use prime numbers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hash table, use numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(hash table, use prime numbers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(hash table, use numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(hash table, use prime numbers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(hash table, use numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hash table, use numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(hash table, use numbers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hash table, use numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hash table, use numbers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(hash table, use numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(table, have used in restaurant numbers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hash table, use numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(table, have used in restaurant numbers)