hat: be in north carolina

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prop
Weight: 0.61
, bag
Weight: 0.59
, shirt
Weight: 0.58
, symbol
Weight: 0.58
, type
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sweatshirt
Weight: 0.33
, scarf
Weight: 0.33
, trash bag
Weight: 0.33
, sweater
Weight: 0.33
, towel
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in north carolina 1.00
be good for missouri 0.78
be for utah 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(prop, be good for missouri) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hat, be in north carolina)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(symbol, be for utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hat, be in north carolina)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hat, be in north carolina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(symbol, be for utah)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hat, be in north carolina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(prop, be good for missouri)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hat, be in north carolina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(symbol, be for utah)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hat, be in north carolina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(prop, be good for missouri)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(prop, be good for missouri) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hat, be in north carolina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hat, be in north carolina)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(symbol, be for utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hat, be in north carolina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hat, be in north carolina)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hat, be in north carolina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hat, be in north carolina)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hat, be in north carolina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hat, be in north carolina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hat, be in north carolina)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hat, be in north carolina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hat, be in north carolina)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hat, be in north carolina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(symbol, be for utah)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hat, be in north carolina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(prop, be good for missouri)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hat, be in north carolina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(symbol, be for utah)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hat, be in north carolina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(prop, be good for missouri)