hat: be performance-wise in time

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prop
Weight: 0.61
, bag
Weight: 0.59
, shirt
Weight: 0.58
, symbol
Weight: 0.58
, type
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sweatshirt
Weight: 0.33
, scarf
Weight: 0.33
, trash bag
Weight: 0.33
, sweater
Weight: 0.33
, towel
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be performance-wise in time 1.00
be in time on ps4 0.96
be in in sutch long time 0.91
be in 555 0.81
ever come half full 0.78
be at even mlg 0.77
is god-damned days 0.77
is days 0.77
be longer in back 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bag, ever come half full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hat, be performance-wise in time)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(shirt, be longer in back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hat, be performance-wise in time)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(shirt, be longer in back)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bag, ever come half full)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(shirt, be longer in back)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(bag, ever come half full)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(sweater, is god-damned days)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sweater, is days)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bag, ever come half full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(hat, be performance-wise in time)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(shirt, be longer in back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(hat, be performance-wise in time)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(sweater, is god-damned days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sweater, is god-damned days)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(sweater, is days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sweater, is days)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(hat, be performance-wise in time)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(hat, be in time on ps4)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(hat, be in time on ps4)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hat, be in in sutch long time)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hat, be in time on ps4)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(hat, be in in sutch long time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hat, be in time on ps4)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(hat, be in in sutch long time)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hat, be in in sutch long time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hat, be performance-wise in time)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hat, be performance-wise in time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(shirt, be longer in back)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bag, ever come half full)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(sweater, is god-damned days)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sweater, is days)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(shirt, be longer in back)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hat, be performance-wise in time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bag, ever come half full)