hat: have green under brim

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prop
Weight: 0.61
, bag
Weight: 0.59
, shirt
Weight: 0.58
, symbol
Weight: 0.58
, type
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sweatshirt
Weight: 0.33
, scarf
Weight: 0.33
, trash bag
Weight: 0.33
, sweater
Weight: 0.33
, towel
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have green under brim 1.00
have green underbrim 0.78
have green 0.78
form under eyes 0.76
be green under bill 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(bag, form under eyes)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hat, have green under brim)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hat, have green under brim)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(bag, form under eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hat, have green under brim)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(bag, form under eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(bag, form under eyes)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(hat, have green under brim)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(hat, have green under brim)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hat, have green under brim)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(hat, have green under brim)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(hat, have green under brim)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hat, have green underbrim)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(hat, have green under brim)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(hat, have green underbrim)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hat, have green under brim)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hat, have green underbrim)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hat, have green under brim)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hat, have green underbrim)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(hat, have green under brim)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hat, have green)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(hat, have green under brim)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hat, have green under brim)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hat, have green under brim)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hat, have green under brim)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hat, have green under brim)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hat, have green under brim)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(bag, form under eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hat, have green under brim)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(bag, form under eyes)