have conversation: be motivated by knowledge

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be motivated by knowledge 1.00
causes increase in knowledge 0.83
be motivated by information 0.82
be motivated by gain information 0.81
be motivated by person be interest 0.79
be motivated by it be interest 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(have conversation, causes increase in knowledge)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(have conversation, be motivated by person be interest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(have conversation, causes increase in knowledge)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(have conversation, be motivated by person be interest)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(have conversation, be motivated by gain information)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(have conversation, be motivated by gain information)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(have conversation, causes increase in knowledge)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(have conversation, be motivated by gain information)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(have conversation, causes increase in knowledge)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(have conversation, be motivated by person be interest)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(have conversation, be motivated by person be interest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(have conversation, be motivated by gain information)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(have conversation, be motivated by knowledge)