hawaii: was anexed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents central america
Weight: 0.62
, location
Weight: 0.61
, country
Weight: 0.60
, island
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.58
Siblings american samoa
Weight: 0.58
, ellis island
Weight: 0.35
, alabama
Weight: 0.35
, alaska
Weight: 0.35
, argentina
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was anexed 1.00
was imperialized 1.00
was annexated 1.00
was made 0.86
was found 0.83
was named 0.78
was discovered 0.77
was created 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ellis island, was made)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ellis island, was created)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(alaska, was named)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ellis island, was made)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(ellis island, was made)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(alaska, was named)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(alaska, was named)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(ellis island, was created)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ellis island, was created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(hawaii, was anexed)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hawaii, was annexated)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hawaii, was annexated)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(hawaii, was annexated)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hawaii, was imperialized)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hawaii, was imperialized)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(hawaii, was imperialized)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(hawaii, was annexated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(hawaii, was imperialized)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(hawaii, was named)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hawaii, was made)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hawaii, was made)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(hawaii, was found)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(hawaii, was named)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hawaii, was discovered)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hawaii, was named)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(hawaii, was made)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(hawaii, was named)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hawaii, was created)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(hawaii, was made)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hawaii, was found)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(hawaii, was found)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(hawaii, was created)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hawaii, was found)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hawaii, was created)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(hawaii, was created)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(hawaii, was discovered)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(hawaii, was discovered)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hawaii, was discovered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hawaii, was anexed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hawaii, was anexed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(alaska, was named)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(ellis island, was made)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hawaii, was anexed)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ellis island, was created)