hawk: survive in city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.68
, predator
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, owl
Weight: 0.36
, falcon
Weight: 0.36
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
survive in city 1.00
survive 0.89
survive in desert 0.81
survive in mountains 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(falcon, survive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(falcon, survive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(falcon, survive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(hawk, survive in city)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(hawk, survive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hawk, survive in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(hawk, survive in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hawk, survive in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hawk, survive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(hawk, survive in desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(hawk, survive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hawk, survive in mountains)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(hawk, survive in mountains)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hawk, survive in mountains)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hawk, survive in mountains)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hawk, survive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hawk, survive in city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hawk, survive in city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hawk, survive in city)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(falcon, survive)