hazard: assessment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.60
, safety
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.71
, chemical
Weight: 0.66
, asbestos
Weight: 0.66
, smoke
Weight: 0.65
, fire
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
assessment 1.00
have nursing assessments 0.84
have necessary nursing assessments 0.83
analysis 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hazard, assessment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(hazard, assessment)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hazard, assessment)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hazard, have necessary nursing assessments)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hazard, assessment)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(hazard, have nursing assessments)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hazard, assessment)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hazard, have necessary nursing assessments)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hazard, assessment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hazard, have nursing assessments)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hazard, assessment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(hazard, analysis)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(hazard, assessment)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(hazard, have necessary nursing assessments)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hazard, assessment)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(hazard, analysis)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(hazard, assessment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(hazard, analysis)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(hazard, assessment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(hazard, have nursing assessments)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(hazard, assessment)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(hazard, analysis)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(hazard, assessment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hazard, have necessary nursing assessments)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(hazard, assessment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hazard, have nursing assessments)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(hazard, assessment)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hazard, assessment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hazard, assessment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hazard, assessment)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hazard, assessment)