hazard: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.60
, safety
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.71
, chemical
Weight: 0.66
, asbestos
Weight: 0.66
, smoke
Weight: 0.65
, fire
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hazard, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hazard, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hazard, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fire, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(hazard, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fire, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fire, is dangerous)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(hazard, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(asbestos, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(asbestos, is dangerous)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(hazard, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(air pollution, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(air pollution, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(hazard, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(hazard, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(hazard, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hazard, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hazard, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(hazard, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hazard, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hazard, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fire, is dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hazard, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(asbestos, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hazard, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(air pollution, is dangerous)