head: be in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leader
Weight: 0.66
, body part
Weight: 0.64
, target
Weight: 0.61
, step
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chief
Weight: 0.62
, concussion
Weight: 0.61
, wig
Weight: 0.54
, arm
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in australia 1.00
be chosen in zealand 0.77
be elcted in philippines 0.77
be determined in mexico 0.77
be in seattle washington help 0.76
come in england 0.76
be in africa 0.76
be thomas jefferson 0.75
was thomas jefferson 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(leader, be determined in mexico)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(head, be in australia)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(leader, be elcted in philippines)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(head, be in australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(head, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(leader, be elcted in philippines)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(head, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(leader, be determined in mexico)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(head, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(leader, be elcted in philippines)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(head, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(leader, be determined in mexico)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(leader, be determined in mexico)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(head, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(head, be in australia)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(leader, be elcted in philippines)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(head, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(head, be in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(head, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(head, be in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(head, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(head, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(head, be in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(head, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(head, be in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(head, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(leader, be elcted in philippines)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(head, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(leader, be determined in mexico)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(head, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(leader, be elcted in philippines)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(head, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(leader, be determined in mexico)