health insurance: be for profit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insurance
Weight: 0.73
, coverage
Weight: 0.71
, protection
Weight: 0.71
, retirement
Weight: 0.70
, service
Weight: 0.68
Siblings postal service
Weight: 0.35
, hospital care
Weight: 0.35
, mortgage
Weight: 0.34
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.34
, escort service
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for profit 1.00
make profit 0.98
be a for profit business 0.97
is revenue 0.79
be profitable for people 0.77
be based on income 0.76
be based on gross income 0.76
be profitable 0.75
is profitable 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be for profit)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mortgage, be based on income)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be for profit)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mortgage, be based on gross income)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(health insurance, be for profit)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mortgage, be based on income)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(mortgage, be based on income)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(health insurance, be for profit)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mortgage, be based on gross income)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(mortgage, be based on gross income)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(health insurance, be for profit)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(health insurance, be for profit)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(health insurance, be for profit)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(health insurance, be based on income)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(health insurance, be for profit)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be based on income)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(health insurance, be for profit)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(health insurance, be based on income)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(health insurance, be for profit)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be based on income)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(health insurance, be for profit)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(health insurance, be for profit)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be for profit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(health insurance, be for profit)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(health insurance, be for profit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be for profit)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(mortgage, be based on income)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be for profit)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(mortgage, be based on gross income)