health: be alike

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.64
, commodity
Weight: 0.63
, value
Weight: 0.62
, sector
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mental health problem
Weight: 0.73
, obesity
Weight: 0.70
, medical doctor
Weight: 0.69
, vaccination
Weight: 0.68
, nutrition
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be alike 1.00
be related components alike 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(value, be alike)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(health, be alike)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(health, be alike)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(value, be alike)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(health, be alike)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(value, be alike)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(value, be alike)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(health, be alike)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(health, be alike)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(health, be alike)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(health, be alike)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(health, be alike)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(health, be related components alike)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(health, be alike)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(health, be related components alike)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(health, be alike)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(health, be related components alike)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(health, be alike)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(health, be related components alike)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(health, be alike)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(health, be alike)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(health, be alike)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(health, be alike)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(health, be alike)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(health, be alike)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(value, be alike)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(health, be alike)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(value, be alike)