heat pump: stop working

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heat
Weight: 0.80
, heating
Weight: 0.65
, technology
Weight: 0.65
, system
Weight: 0.64
Siblings heat sink
Weight: 0.39
, heat stroke
Weight: 0.39
, temperature
Weight: 0.37
, furnace
Weight: 0.37
, blow dryer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
stop working 1.00
put in work 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, stop working)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(blow dryer, stop working)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, stop working)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(furnace, stop working)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(heat pump, stop working)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(blow dryer, stop working)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(blow dryer, stop working)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(heat pump, stop working)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(furnace, stop working)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(furnace, stop working)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(heat pump, stop working)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(heat pump, stop working)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(heat pump, stop working)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(heat pump, put in work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(heat pump, stop working)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(heat pump, put in work)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(heat pump, stop working)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(heat pump, put in work)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(heat pump, stop working)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, put in work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(heat pump, stop working)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(heat pump, stop working)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, stop working)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(heat pump, stop working)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(heat pump, stop working)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, stop working)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(blow dryer, stop working)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, stop working)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(furnace, stop working)