heat stroke: be primarily dangerous to people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heat
Weight: 0.72
, illness
Weight: 0.69
, injury
Weight: 0.65
, complication
Weight: 0.63
, condition
Weight: 0.62
Siblings heat pump
Weight: 0.39
, heat sink
Weight: 0.37
, stroke
Weight: 0.37
, congestive heart failure
Weight: 0.35
, pneumonia
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be primarily dangerous to people 1.00
is dangerous 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stroke, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(stroke, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(stroke, is dangerous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(pneumonia, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(pneumonia, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(heat stroke, is dangerous)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(heat stroke, is dangerous)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(heat stroke, is dangerous)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(pneumonia, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, be primarily dangerous to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(stroke, is dangerous)