heat stroke: be worse than heat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heat
Weight: 0.72
, illness
Weight: 0.69
, injury
Weight: 0.65
, complication
Weight: 0.63
, condition
Weight: 0.62
Siblings heat pump
Weight: 0.39
, heat sink
Weight: 0.37
, stroke
Weight: 0.37
, congestive heart failure
Weight: 0.35
, pneumonia
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse than heat 1.00
be worse than heat exhaustion 0.88
has quality worse 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, be worse than heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has quality worse)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(heat stroke, be worse than heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(stroke, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(stroke, has quality worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(heat stroke, be worse than heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(heat stroke, be worse than heat)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(heat stroke, be worse than heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(heat stroke, be worse than heat exhaustion)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(heat stroke, be worse than heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(heat stroke, be worse than heat exhaustion)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(heat stroke, be worse than heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(heat stroke, has quality worse)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(heat stroke, be worse than heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(heat stroke, has quality worse)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(heat stroke, be worse than heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(heat stroke, be worse than heat exhaustion)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(heat stroke, be worse than heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(heat stroke, has quality worse)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(heat stroke, be worse than heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, be worse than heat exhaustion)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(heat stroke, be worse than heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, has quality worse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(heat stroke, be worse than heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(heat stroke, be worse than heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, be worse than heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(heat stroke, be worse than heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(heat stroke, be worse than heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, be worse than heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(stroke, has quality worse)