heat stroke: is life emergency

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heat
Weight: 0.72
, illness
Weight: 0.69
, injury
Weight: 0.65
, complication
Weight: 0.63
, condition
Weight: 0.62
Siblings heat pump
Weight: 0.39
, heat sink
Weight: 0.37
, stroke
Weight: 0.37
, congestive heart failure
Weight: 0.35
, pneumonia
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is life emergency 1.00
has state emergency 0.93
is life threatening emergency 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, is life emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(stroke, has state emergency)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(heat stroke, is life emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(stroke, has state emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(stroke, has state emergency)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(heat stroke, is life emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(heat stroke, is life emergency)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(heat stroke, is life emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(heat stroke, has state emergency)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(heat stroke, is life emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(heat stroke, is life threatening emergency)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(heat stroke, is life emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, has state emergency)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(heat stroke, is life emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(heat stroke, has state emergency)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(heat stroke, is life emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(heat stroke, is life threatening emergency)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(heat stroke, is life emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(heat stroke, is life threatening emergency)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(heat stroke, is life emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(heat stroke, has state emergency)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(heat stroke, is life emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, is life threatening emergency)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(heat stroke, is life emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(heat stroke, is life emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, is life emergency)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(heat stroke, is life emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(heat stroke, is life emergency)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(heat stroke, is life emergency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(stroke, has state emergency)